A new study by the Curtin University Sustainable Tourism Centre identifies plans for a massive polluting LNG industrial site near Broome as a serious threat to the Kimberley’s unique and globally-recognised tourism ‘brand’.
The report entitled “Kimberley Whale Coast Tourism: A review of opportunities and threats” by Dr Michael Hughes and colleagues from Curtin University was commissioned by The Conservation Council in collaboration with two of our most active member groups: Wilderness Society and Environs Kimberley.
The report finds significant opportunities for increased regional economic benefits, including employment, through the burgeoning whale watching industry and enhanced marine protection. Broome is uniquely placed to benefit from whale tourism because of the proximity of the Humpbacks and the fact they are in the area to give birth to calves. The study presents a series of important findings that are at odds with recent government studies and statements on the impact of LNG industrialisation on Broome and Kimberley tourism.
Download a copy of the Kimberley_WhaleCoast_Report[1]
Some key findings:
- The Kimberley tourism ‘brand’ is based on the unique natural and cultural values of the region, including its wildlife and vast, unspoiled coast and landscapes;
- Tourism is more valuable to the regional economy than resource projects which return less to the local economy, employ fewer local people and have relatively short lifespans;
- When iconic brands are damaged – as occurred in the 1970’s with the location of an oil refinery on the Shetland Islands – it takes a lot of time, money and effort to rebuild
- Currently around 10 tour operators, including Aboriginal run businesses, offer whale-watching experiences out of Broome & the Dampier Peninisula – the site of the proposed LNG hub and port.
- There appears to be a substantial imbalance between government support for tourism, including Indigenous tourism enterprises, and the far greater level of funding for resource extraction projects.
- The government needs to recognise the findings of the study which highlight the fact that Broome and surrounding communities do not need large scale industrial projects to secure their economic future.
In particular, WA and Commonwealth Tourism Ministers – Dr Liz Constable and Martin Ferguson – need to stand up for the Kimberley tourism industry and ensure that ill-considered resource projects do not ‘kill the goose that lays the golden egg.’
Environment groups believe Kimberley tourism needs better management and requires much more Indigenous involvement. This can be achieved through expanded Indigenous Rangers programs, creation of new Indigenous Protected Areas (IPAs) and the introduction of a comprehensive licensing and permit system for tourism operators and tourists accessing remote land and sea country.
Support the Conservation Council – your independent voice for the environment by clicking here

To Who it may Concern
I am writing to because I am very concerned about what they are trying to to the Kimberly I feel it wrong to destroy something that is so beautiful it should let for genrations to come I had the pleasure of seeing the Kimberly last year and have fallen in love with it’s beauty and there were lots of other people there who felt the same way
I feel the Kimberly would even more popular than the Barrier Reef if promoted more
So PLEASE I beg of don’t destroy the Kimberly
Yours Sincerly Kerry Firkin
Some excellent whale watching photos are there,search “Australia wide whale watching cruises”
[...] ground for hump-back whales in the world. Recently the Conservation Council and our member groups released a report commissioned from the Curtin University Sustainable Tourism Centre demonstrating that this [...]